<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capitalism - Prosperity or demise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: look inside here</title>
		<link>http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/#comment-8551</link>
		<dc:creator>look inside here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/#comment-8551</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;look inside here...&lt;/strong&gt;

You are right I think you have said it very well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>look inside here&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You are right I think you have said it very well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moody</title>
		<link>http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/#comment-7441</link>
		<dc:creator>moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/#comment-7441</guid>
		<description>New article just came out on money msn about how much you will need in medical expenses once you retire. Article basically confirms what I was saying in this article; it says that basically you;re screwed, but gives following solutions:
Figure out where you stand.
Save some more
Get long-term-care insurance
Take care of yourself.


What a bunch of useless advices. That is exactly what I was saying about bullshitting. Not one solution mentions the actual problem or voting for your interest so this kind of thing DOES NOT happen when you retire.
You can read the whole article here:
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/AssessYourNeeds/WillMedicalBillsRuinRetirement.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New article just came out on money msn about how much you will need in medical expenses once you retire. Article basically confirms what I was saying in this article; it says that basically you;re screwed, but gives following solutions:<br />
Figure out where you stand.<br />
Save some more<br />
Get long-term-care insurance<br />
Take care of yourself.</p>
<p>What a bunch of useless advices. That is exactly what I was saying about bullshitting. Not one solution mentions the actual problem or voting for your interest so this kind of thing DOES NOT happen when you retire.<br />
You can read the whole article here:<br />
<a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/AssessYourNeeds/WillMedicalBillsRuinRetirement.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/AssessYourNeeds/WillMedicalBillsRuinRetirement.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fyodor</title>
		<link>http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/#comment-7434</link>
		<dc:creator>Fyodor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crankypot.com/2008/04/16/capitalism/#comment-7434</guid>
		<description>This is a great post.  The American Dream is the biggest scam the elites have created against the working man.  This is why poor people vote Republican: because they too want to be rich one day.  "Don't complain, just work and consume attitude" that you point to is so entrenched into the American psyche that individuals vote against their interests: they vote for lower taxes for the rich (which means less resources and social services for them); and they vote against unionizing.  Take this example.  I have an American friend who constantly complains about Europeans being lazy and he points to the 35 working hour week in France.  When the Sarkozy government wanted to increase it to 37 (and I think they have I am not sure though) the unions paralyzed the country with strikes.  Because the French have learned to enjoy life: work, but also have long weekends and afternoons to spend with their families.  Why is this a bad thing?  But the American friend of mine did not say this is not sustainable, but that somehow the French people are acting irrationally for wanting this lifestyle?  So, I guess he would prefer to work 50 hours per week!  What this shows is a complete change in consciousness among the people.

And in the small country such as Bosnia the effects of globalization are striking.  I interviewed a woman yesterday who worked in the hospitality business before teh war, but since she has no degree or no specialized skills, and is 50 years old, no one wants to hire her now, and since there is a very weak (and almost non-existent) social net, she (along with her two 20 year old sons) lives on 150marks (about $130) per month.  It hit me that her situation is not caused simply by Bosnia's war-battered economy, but by Bosnia's inability to compete in the global market.  It is the story that can be found across the US in small idnustrial towns in Illinois and Pennsylvania.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post.  The American Dream is the biggest scam the elites have created against the working man.  This is why poor people vote Republican: because they too want to be rich one day.  &#8220;Don&#8217;t complain, just work and consume attitude&#8221; that you point to is so entrenched into the American psyche that individuals vote against their interests: they vote for lower taxes for the rich (which means less resources and social services for them); and they vote against unionizing.  Take this example.  I have an American friend who constantly complains about Europeans being lazy and he points to the 35 working hour week in France.  When the Sarkozy government wanted to increase it to 37 (and I think they have I am not sure though) the unions paralyzed the country with strikes.  Because the French have learned to enjoy life: work, but also have long weekends and afternoons to spend with their families.  Why is this a bad thing?  But the American friend of mine did not say this is not sustainable, but that somehow the French people are acting irrationally for wanting this lifestyle?  So, I guess he would prefer to work 50 hours per week!  What this shows is a complete change in consciousness among the people.</p>
<p>And in the small country such as Bosnia the effects of globalization are striking.  I interviewed a woman yesterday who worked in the hospitality business before teh war, but since she has no degree or no specialized skills, and is 50 years old, no one wants to hire her now, and since there is a very weak (and almost non-existent) social net, she (along with her two 20 year old sons) lives on 150marks (about $130) per month.  It hit me that her situation is not caused simply by Bosnia&#8217;s war-battered economy, but by Bosnia&#8217;s inability to compete in the global market.  It is the story that can be found across the US in small idnustrial towns in Illinois and Pennsylvania.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
