http://www.crankypot.com/2008/03/18/fine-tuning-argument/ Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:09:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://www.crankypot.com/2008/03/18/fine-tuning-argument/#comment-7033 moody Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:57:38 +0000 http://www.crankypot.com/2008/03/18/fine-tuning-argument/#comment-7033 Amen... Amen…

]]> http://www.crankypot.com/2008/03/18/fine-tuning-argument/#comment-7032 xcwillix Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:55:58 +0000 http://www.crankypot.com/2008/03/18/fine-tuning-argument/#comment-7032 I think I am in agreement for once -- For instance - A tree is a tree because the environment was suited for the developement of what eventially became trees. Not the other way around - The universe did not adapt itself to provide for an already existing tree. I think I am in agreement for once —
For instance - A tree is a tree because the environment was suited for the developement of what eventially became trees. Not the other way around - The universe did not adapt itself to provide for an already existing tree.

]]>